Skip to content
loam

Writing evidence for teachers in the AI era

See how the work was written.

Students write in Loam. You receive the final document, a replay and verification checks on the writing record. You decide what the evidence means.

Loam uses no screen recording or camera and captures only changes made inside its editor.

The student

Write, revise and hand in the history.

The student stays in one witnessed editor from the first sentence to final submission.

The student

Write the work here.

The editor feels familiar. Every revision becomes part of a record the student can stand behind.

The privacy boundary

The record stays inside the editor.

Loam records changes made in this writing space. It does not record the student's screen or camera. Work done elsewhere is not part of this record.

That protects privacy and sets an honest limit on what the evidence can establish.

The student

Paste a link. Attach the source. Type the prose.

Links and files still work. A block of ready-made prose stops at the editor boundary.

The student

Revision becomes visible.

A claim is softened. A sentence moves. Loam remembers the work without interrupting it.

The student

Finish by recalling the argument.

Where the teacher enables it, the essay locks and the student writes a short summary from memory.

The student

Handed in with its history.

The final document, its replay and its verification record arrive together.

The teacher

The writing arrives with its evidence.

Read the work first. Then replay, inspect and respond with professional judgement.

The teacher

Start with the writing.

Read the submitted version first. Select a passage and leave a comment where it belongs.

The teacher

Watch the writing take shape.

Move through the session at real time or skip long pauses. See what changed without reading a technical log.

The teacher

Go to the moment worth a closer look.

Process signals can point to unusually regular typing, limited revision or a passage that arrived differently from the rest.

Signals direct attention. You make the judgment.

The teacher

Check the record itself.

A verified record is a fact about the evidence, not a finding about the student.

The teacher

Grade, explain, return.

Add a score, grade and feedback. Return the work, or request a redo that continues the same history.

The school

Move from one assignment to the whole school.

See adoption, manage people and keep term billing predictable.

The school

See how Loam is being used.

Live counts across the school's own records show activity, reviews, replay use and verification coverage.

The school

Bring in a whole cohort.

Invite one person, paste a spreadsheet or upload a CSV. Admin rights stay a deliberate choice.

The school

One count each term.

Students are counted once on census day. Mid-term additions wait until the next term.

One continuous product story. A student writes and revises an essay inside Loam, encounters the prose paste boundary, completes an optional from-memory summary, and hands in the document with its history. The teacher reads and comments, replays the writing, checks process signals and verification facts, then grades, gives feedback, or requests a redo. The school workspace then opens to analytics, people management and billing.

Opening

Writing evidence for teachers in the AI era

See how the work was written.

Students write in Loam. You receive the final document, a replay and verification checks on the writing record. You decide what the evidence means.

Loam uses no screen recording or camera and captures only changes made inside its editor.

The student

Write, revise and hand in the history.

Loam records changes made inside its editor, keeps the evidence attached and sends the work to the teacher with its history.

loamYear 11 English · My work

The work students must still do

Generative AI can support school writing, but it should not replace the thinking that helps students form and test an argument.

AI can help a student test a counterargument after they form a position. If it supplies the position first, it replaces part of the learning the task was designed to develop.

All changes witnessed

The teacher

Read, comment, replay, verify and respond.

The final writing remains central. Evidence and process signals support the teacher's professional judgment.

loamHillcrest High School · Amelia Chen

The work students must still do

Generative AI can support school writing, but it should not replace the thinking that helps students form and test an argument. AI can help a student test a counterargument after they form a position.

Replay ready · 184 events

The school

Make it workable at scale.

Analytics, bulk invitations and stable term billing give school leaders the operational view they need.

loamHillcrest High School · Analytics
Students412
Active students388
Submissions1,284
Evidence verified99.6%
Teacher activity this term
TeacherClassesSubmissionsReviewsReplays
Mr. James Okoro3968847
Ms. Priya Nair411210431
Dr. Emily Tran2736928

Optional website analytics

With your permission, Loam uses PostHog EU to understand which public pages help visitors and where they leave. Session replay masks every input and is disabled entirely on the document-verifier page. We do not run PostHog analytics inside the signed-in app.

Read the cookie and analytics notice